Skip to main content

Teaching for Tomorrow Part 2

Please post your comments on Section 2: Six Ways to Teach for Independent and Higher Learning here. What do you think we are doing really well? What areas should we be focusing on for improvement?

Comments

  1. David WiegertJuly 21, 2008 at 4:31 AM

    As a 2nd grade teacher the closest I get to teaching the 6 ways to independent and higher learning is in science (FOSS). As I reflect upon our curricula, perhaps the elementary science kits are most focused "self-discovered learning" (p.21).

    I found the "fundamental shift" (problems (or discovery) first and teaching second) (pp.28-39) to be profound and more realistic to the real world. This should also reduce the "fear of failure" (pp. 40-44) by empowering students to take more, and ultimately better, constructive risks. This shift is also more realistic in that it promotes better decision making when there are no clear-cut "right" or "wrong" answers (p.43).

    Ultimately, the need to "reevaluate evaluation" (pp. 44-48) is necessary for us to deploy our time, energy and resources most effectively. "What gets measured, gets done," is an unavoidable truth (p.45) that too often causes the evaluative "tail" to wag the instructional "dog" (p.48).

    ReplyDelete
  2. DaveJuly 29, 2008 at 7:01 AM

    Thanks Dave for your thoughts. I agree that we have long thought of science as an obvious place for constructivism. However, I wonder if we shouldn't be expanding into other areas as well. I guess writers and readers' workshops are a beginning. But as long as unit tests are the ultimate evaluation, we are not able to determine if kids really understand literacy in the sense of can they find relevant, reliable information when needed or can they interpret the information to make sense of it or can they effectively communicate what they have read. Instead, we test to see if they know what color the dog's collar was in the story or have them spit out irrelevant facts as an evaluation.

    As for teaching our students to think, I agree that many teachers (me included) find it very rewarding when we can give students the answer. It makes us feel valued. We really need to look critically at our role in helping students learn how to solve problems.

    ReplyDelete
  3. SueBJuly 29, 2008 at 7:51 AM

    HI
    Interesting discussion. I found this section to connect with what I know about good gifted education. I am a firm believer in constructionist approach. It amazes me how we ask V21 students to be the one's who have all the answers but we should be having the ask the good questions.

    It still amazes me how we teach in isolation.. even in math. We don't connect various math strategies for multiplication, we don't ask why does this method work. We need to.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnneAugust 5, 2008 at 3:50 PM

    I really enjoyed the fact that the book gave us specific examples and ways to teach for higher learning. After I read the first chapter, I was feeling a little anxious, like the book was going to tell us everything we were doing wrong, and then not give us concrete examples of what we could or should be doing to better the education students receive. It is so familiar when McCain described a classroom where students were paralyzed in their tracks when the teacher isn't telling them what they should be doing. I really want to work at helping my students become more independent learners and accept that they might have to struggle a bit to get to where they need to be. That is one of my faults. I always want to jump right in when I see a student struggling, but after reading this section, I realized that there are times where it is good for a student to find their own way without having the teacher jump in to fix things. What are they going to do when there isn't a teacher there to tell them what to do? I also really liked the idea of making sure that things are like things they would experience in their life, making the lesson relevant in their life. I think most teachers do their best to make things relevant and meaningful, but this book gave me even more ideas of how I can do this. In the past, I have had students act as travel agents, and have seen the strong success of that unit. This book has encouraged me to continue to find those connections to make my units as meaningful as possible. The students could take on the role of an editor, a critic, a film director, talk show host, disc jockey, etc. There are so many possibilities for my classroom. I am excited to implement a few changes so that I can start "teaching for tomorrow" in my corner of the world. :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Creating Traditions

Over the winter break, my wife and I got talking about traditions. At this time of year, there are many. Somehow or another, the conversation ended up on technology. (I don't know how... really!!) We were talking about how traditions are a part of our core values. For us, a love of nature is a core value. We have planned a couple of family trips to take advantage of the nature that is accessible throughout our country. We talked about how many people, including us at times, feel like technology can be a threat to our core values. It might be in conflict with our work/life balance, our love of the outdoors, our perceptions of what good relationships are about. But then we began talking about how technology has helped us build on our core values. As we planned our trip to Utah to go to the National Parks, we used the Internet to research the parks, find a flight, book a hotel, rent a car, and look at maps of the area. We might use a GPS system to help us get around while we are there...
4 comments
Read more

From See Saw to Balance Beam

Lately I've been feeling a bit conflicted. I hear some people write very eloquently about the power of data. If we collect good data on our students, we can use that data to help inform instruction. We will make sure that every student gets the instruction they need. They talk about common formative assessments. They talk about personalizing education. I hear others write equally eloquently about the fact that easy access to information changes how and what we teach drastically. They talk about constructivism and project based learning. They talk about the importance of creativity and design. They talk about deconstructing curriculum and focusing on skills instead of content. And me? I feel like a see saw. One day I'm on the data bandwagon. The next day I'm a hardcore constructivist. And I often have a hard time reconciling these two notions. On my data days, I'm thinking about standards, assessments, how my instruction ties into the curriculum. On my constructivist day...
3 comments
Read more

The Well Equipped Computer Lab - Feedback Encouraged!

I have the wonderful opportunity (and responsibility) to research and select some software for our elementary school computer labs. I have a moderate budget, but it is enough to purchase 3-5 new titles depending on costs. The committee will meet throughout this year and hopefully make its decision by March. I am very interested in the feedback of others, both within the district and elsewhere. We currently have some software in the labs that are still being used. This is an opportunity to fill in some gaps. I also want to go on record as stating that I recognize that there are many websites, free or otherwise, that can meet some of our needs. However, as we collect websites for specific skills and concepts, we are learning that there are often drawbacks to many of them, whether it is the fact that they are not part of a cohesive program that can track progress and individualize instruction or that they have many distracting elements on the screen. I also feel strongly that the core of ...
4 comments
Read more