Skip to main content

Can you learn literacy from a textbook?

After reading about this course about Critical Literacies, it really got me thinking about how we teach. We use textbooks and assign chapters to be read. We all come to class having read the same thing and then discuss it. Sound familiar? Well, I have to admit, I don't get it.

In my world, no one assigns me what to read. I have to go find it. I have to sift through gobs (yes, this is a technical term!) of information and find the most relevant, accurate, non-biased, current information. I love the design of this course. It basically breaks the course down into four categories:

1. Aggregate - Give students access to lots of information and give them the opportunity to practice the skill of focusing their search and finding the best information. Don't just tell them what to read, show them where to go to find the information. Teach them how to search, analyze sources, and choose the best information. This is a skill that will be essential to their future!

2. Remix -  Give students practice organizing the information they find, consolidating information from multiple sources into one place. Ideally, it should be a place where the notes can be easily shared, like a blog, social bookmarking site, MOODLE, or some other place.

3. Repurpose - Give students experience communicating their learning using tools that allow them to publish their ideas. Teach them to create new learning from what they have absorbed. No more regurgitating knowledge. Students must redesign what they learn into new products.

4. Feed Forward - Let students share their learning. We live in a society in which sharing is easy and powerful. We should be teaching our students about how to do it effectively and responsibly. They have a digital footprint. We should be helping them design it.

I can predict some of the questions and concerns that people will have. How do you hold a discussion when everyone has read something different? How do ensure that what the students choose is authoritative and accurate? How do you control where they go to make sure they don't get off track?

As I see it, those are the fundamental questions for research today. If we don't tackle them, are we really teaching research skills? Research is challenging. We don't do our students any favors by avoiding the challenge and making it easier.

So here is my challenge to you: Start the fall with a list of resources. Give your students the freedom to select which sources are best. Let that freedom feed a discussion about effective research practices. Then help your students lead discussions through online publishing tools.

Thanks to Rita Kop and Stephen Downes at http://ple.elg.ca/course/ for their great idea!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Creating Traditions

Over the winter break, my wife and I got talking about traditions. At this time of year, there are many. Somehow or another, the conversation ended up on technology. (I don't know how... really!!) We were talking about how traditions are a part of our core values. For us, a love of nature is a core value. We have planned a couple of family trips to take advantage of the nature that is accessible throughout our country. We talked about how many people, including us at times, feel like technology can be a threat to our core values. It might be in conflict with our work/life balance, our love of the outdoors, our perceptions of what good relationships are about. But then we began talking about how technology has helped us build on our core values. As we planned our trip to Utah to go to the National Parks, we used the Internet to research the parks, find a flight, book a hotel, rent a car, and look at maps of the area. We might use a GPS system to help us get around while we are there...

The Well Equipped Computer Lab - Feedback Encouraged!

I have the wonderful opportunity (and responsibility) to research and select some software for our elementary school computer labs. I have a moderate budget, but it is enough to purchase 3-5 new titles depending on costs. The committee will meet throughout this year and hopefully make its decision by March. I am very interested in the feedback of others, both within the district and elsewhere. We currently have some software in the labs that are still being used. This is an opportunity to fill in some gaps. I also want to go on record as stating that I recognize that there are many websites, free or otherwise, that can meet some of our needs. However, as we collect websites for specific skills and concepts, we are learning that there are often drawbacks to many of them, whether it is the fact that they are not part of a cohesive program that can track progress and individualize instruction or that they have many distracting elements on the screen. I also feel strongly that the core of ...

From See Saw to Balance Beam

Lately I've been feeling a bit conflicted. I hear some people write very eloquently about the power of data. If we collect good data on our students, we can use that data to help inform instruction. We will make sure that every student gets the instruction they need. They talk about common formative assessments. They talk about personalizing education. I hear others write equally eloquently about the fact that easy access to information changes how and what we teach drastically. They talk about constructivism and project based learning. They talk about the importance of creativity and design. They talk about deconstructing curriculum and focusing on skills instead of content. And me? I feel like a see saw. One day I'm on the data bandwagon. The next day I'm a hardcore constructivist. And I often have a hard time reconciling these two notions. On my data days, I'm thinking about standards, assessments, how my instruction ties into the curriculum. On my constructivist day...