Skip to main content

The Wonderful World of Updates

As a SmartBoard district, we have many teachers using SmartBoards, Airliners, and, of course, Notebook software. So as a Notebook user, I am very excited about the new version 10 that has recently been released. It has many great new features which I will be sharing in later posts. However, as the primary trainer for users of Notebook software, this transition raises many questions about the value of updates.

Many of our users are new to Smart Notebook software. I have trained about 100 people this year alone. Now I need to go back to them and tell them that this great tool I showed them is about to look quite different. To a third of them, this will be welcome news. They want the updates. They want the new features. They will pick it up quickly. To a second third, this will raise trepidation. Just when they are getting the hang of it, they go and change it. They will require a fair amount of support to bring them up to the same level of comfort with the new version. That leaves the remaining third. I am concerned that there is a group of people out there that will welcome this change as an opportunity to jump off the ship. They might say something like, "See. That's what's wrong with technology. It keeps changing. We don't have time to keep up with these changes. Better to go back to the old way of doing things."

I admit, this is not a scientific study. My numbers are probably not accurate, but the three groups are real. How do we unroll this change to maximize the excitement of the first group, while minimizing the anxiety of the other groups? I plan to communicate the change to them often so there are no surprises. I of course plan to have many trainings in the fall, but I still worry that teachers will arrive in September to an unfamiliar looking Notebook program and decide not to use it.

Am I overreacting? Is there something we can do to minimize this problem? Do you have any experiences with similar issues? I'd love to hear from you.

Comments

  1. The update *is* good. In fact, an even worse problem would arise if we *didn't* update. If teachers, over the summer, downloaded version 10, only to come back to school with version 9.X still installed, would their version 10 file open and work on 9.X? Without trying it, I'm going to say "probably not".

    I would introduce the new version before the end of the year. Maybe, if possible, using a dual-installation method, so both version could exist for now (so if things went wrong, they could fall back on the older version). Hopefully, teachers who use the old version would get used to the new version, and become more comfortable over the summer / beginning of the school year. As for the people who would be overwhelmed, the training sessions at the beginning of the year would help them overcome that.

    As for the people who would dismiss this because technology keeps changing, that's a terrible excuse. Technology changes because the needs change. I like the line from "Did You Know 2.0" (http://shifthappens.wikispaces.com/) that says, "We’re preparing students for jobs that haven’t been invented yet". How can we do that when we're using antiquated teaching methods?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks KW.

    I agree that we need to do the updates, for both of the reasons you mention. As people update to 10, we need to be able to open those files. Also, we need to prepare students for the yet to be invented jobs. This requires constantly updating to stay at the forefront.

    I'm not suggesting that we don't do the updates. I'm more thinking about the challenges it creates. I like the suggestion that we update before the end of the year. However, with the reimaging that will take place this summer, it doesn't make sense to do it separately. However, all trainings from here on out will be in version 10 so all staff will see the new interface and learn about the differences.

    I appreciate your ideas. Thanks for the feedback.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Creating Traditions

Over the winter break, my wife and I got talking about traditions. At this time of year, there are many. Somehow or another, the conversation ended up on technology. (I don't know how... really!!) We were talking about how traditions are a part of our core values. For us, a love of nature is a core value. We have planned a couple of family trips to take advantage of the nature that is accessible throughout our country. We talked about how many people, including us at times, feel like technology can be a threat to our core values. It might be in conflict with our work/life balance, our love of the outdoors, our perceptions of what good relationships are about. But then we began talking about how technology has helped us build on our core values. As we planned our trip to Utah to go to the National Parks, we used the Internet to research the parks, find a flight, book a hotel, rent a car, and look at maps of the area. We might use a GPS system to help us get around while we are there...

From See Saw to Balance Beam

Lately I've been feeling a bit conflicted. I hear some people write very eloquently about the power of data. If we collect good data on our students, we can use that data to help inform instruction. We will make sure that every student gets the instruction they need. They talk about common formative assessments. They talk about personalizing education. I hear others write equally eloquently about the fact that easy access to information changes how and what we teach drastically. They talk about constructivism and project based learning. They talk about the importance of creativity and design. They talk about deconstructing curriculum and focusing on skills instead of content. And me? I feel like a see saw. One day I'm on the data bandwagon. The next day I'm a hardcore constructivist. And I often have a hard time reconciling these two notions. On my data days, I'm thinking about standards, assessments, how my instruction ties into the curriculum. On my constructivist day...

The Well Equipped Computer Lab - Feedback Encouraged!

I have the wonderful opportunity (and responsibility) to research and select some software for our elementary school computer labs. I have a moderate budget, but it is enough to purchase 3-5 new titles depending on costs. The committee will meet throughout this year and hopefully make its decision by March. I am very interested in the feedback of others, both within the district and elsewhere. We currently have some software in the labs that are still being used. This is an opportunity to fill in some gaps. I also want to go on record as stating that I recognize that there are many websites, free or otherwise, that can meet some of our needs. However, as we collect websites for specific skills and concepts, we are learning that there are often drawbacks to many of them, whether it is the fact that they are not part of a cohesive program that can track progress and individualize instruction or that they have many distracting elements on the screen. I also feel strongly that the core of ...